-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
[skip-changelog] Some integration test refactorings #1911
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
It doesn't make much sense to keep it separate in a different library
3be00a2
to
0c8938e
Compare
Codecov ReportBase: 36.65% // Head: 36.84% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1911 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.65% 36.84% +0.18%
==========================================
Files 231 234 +3
Lines 19683 19758 +75
==========================================
+ Hits 7215 7280 +65
- Misses 11640 11648 +8
- Partials 828 830 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
Co-authored-by: MatteoPologruto <[email protected]>
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
See how to contribute
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.md
has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)What kind of change does this PR introduce?
go.bug.st/testsuite
has been integrated into the repo: it doesn't make much sense to have it separated in a different library. We may possibly extract the most useful function in the future if we deem it useful.SharedDir
object to share directories between tests. The shared directory is locked before use and must be unlocked after use. TheSharedDir
object providesLock
andUnlock
methods to do so.What is the current behavior?
No changes in behavior
What is the new behavior?
No changes in behavior
Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?
No